Transparency · public registers
Bias reviews
The founding team's affinity for Bitcoin and self-custody is a motivation, and a risk for teaching. Bias reviews check where the platform favours one side.
No bias review published yet
How each review will be listed
- Scheduled
- In progress
- Findings published
- Actions closed
Each entry names its date, scope, the reviewer’s standpoint, the findings and how many are resolved.
What is reviewed
Before each major content release and each new version of the rating method, a reviewer with the opposite standpoint (banking, central banking or consumer protection) checks where explainers favour one side, and where fiat and bank money have not been given their due where they are strong.
Once a year the review also compares how the platform treats customers and non-customers, so that no commercial relationship shows up in ratings, rankings or texts.
How a review runs
A review is scheduled, carried out, and its findings are published in full. The actions it leads to are tracked until they are closed, and each review is listed here with its date, scope and findings.
A rating system in which Bitcoin can never lose points is not a rating system.
Who reviews
pending: Reviewers and their background